How far does a duty of care extend for a Taxi Driver?

News >>

QBE has been ordered to pay 80% of a $760,000 claim on behalf of their client when Justice Fryberg had to rule on the civil responsibility for the death of Stephen Crouch.  French v QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited [2011] QSC 105  

He was a house painter who attended a Saturday evening  barbecue at Southport for about four hours and after becoming intoxicated, had been manipulated into a taxi. The taxi driver received instructions to deliver him safely home to what he believed he was told was 27 Yangoora Crescent rather than number 37 where he lived. The female occupant said she had no idea who he was. He was found dead on a road about two hours later.

It is what happened between this time which is crucial to the judgement made.

The Taxi Driver could not extract more details of the passenger’s address so called his Base who requested police assistance. After it had not arrived ten minutes, the driver rolled Crouch out of the back door of the cab onto the footpath still asleep but took the passenger’s mobile phone?  Was this in lieu of payment?

After the Taxi left, he awoke and started wandering around the locality until he was run over first by an unidentified vehicle and secondly by a 19-year-old driver in another car with one headlight out. He died at the scene following the second collision.

The widow, Elizabeth French, sued the nominal defendant (in respect of the unidentified driver), the taxi driver, the taxi company, and the 19-year-old plus his CTP insurer.

The plaintiff failed in her claim against the Taxi Company and although the second driver breached his duty to the still alive Mr Crouch by running him over, that accident, because it could not be established what parts of his body had been hit by his car could not be proven to have contributed to his ultimate death.

The plaintiff succeeded however in her claim against the unidentified driver and the taxi driver’s insurer, QBE.

The Taxi driver was held to have owed Mr Crouch a duty in tort and in contract as ‘carrier’, to have delivered him home safely and in the circumstances that arose, to remain with him at least until the police arrived. This standard of care the driver was required to observe was to be ”responsible for delivering Mr Crouch to a place of safety or to another person who would look after him.” The taxi driver ”ought reasonably to have known that if you failed to deliver Mr Crouch to his home or otherwise to a situation of safety, but left him lying on the footpath, there was a risk that he would wake up, wander onto the carriageway and be hit by a vehicle”.

QBE accepted liability for its insured Taxi driver, who unfortunately died before the trial last May, as it was required to do under s51 of the Insurance Contracts Act. There was no claim against the taxi driver’s Compulsory Third Party insurer even though that unsafely discharging a drunk passenger asleep on the side of the road might arguably have resulted in an injury may be within s5 of the Motor Accident Insurance Act,

The unidentified driver was also liable – not in respect of his collision with Crouch which couldn’t be proven – but because he too abandoned Crouch to the risk of further injury. The driver ought to have appreciated that he had hit something on the road and should have investigated. Such action, had it occurred, would likely have removed Mr Crouch from the carriageway and the risk of further injury.

According to his honour, the unidentified driver ”created or at least gravely aggravated the hazard to which Mr Crouch was exposed. He owed Mr Crouch a duty to exercise reasonable care to prevent further injury from oncoming vehicles.”

These days, the Civil Liability Act clarifies these dutues but this claim was not defeated by s46 of the Civil Liability Act (QLD) because according to the court, the standard of care had to be measured according to the incapacity of the passenger. Such incapacity “might equally have been due to some other condition” and thus should not be reduced “simply because …it was a consequence of voluntary intoxication.”

Also s47 of the Civil Liability Act did not operate to reduce the widow’s damages by reason of her spouse’s contributory negligence. The provisions of s10 of the Law Reform Act insteadprevailed and although it was open to the court to hold the deceased liable for contributory negligence, his honour found that it could not be established:  voluntary intoxication was of itself insufficient proof.

The total loss of dependency to the widow and four children was assessed at $762,350 and judgment was entered in the plaintiff’s favour for that amount. Liability was apportioned between the nominal defendant as to 20% and QBE, for the taxi driver, as to 80%.



Last changed: Dec 02 2011 at 3:10 PM


  1. None Found

Add Comment

Latest News

Robert Cooper - one of 100 faces of small business

This week it was announced as part of Small Business Week,  that Robert has been named one of the 100 faces of small business for a State Government promotion on the great value that small businesses play in the State of Queensland.

You can see Robert's entry here:

It is the third accolade for CPR Insurance Services in a month and after seven and a half years in business is a real pep up for the company.

For Robert, it is the culmination of many years experience, becoming well qualified, experiencing the highs and lows of a career and always wanting to contribute to his community. Sometimes, these things just come together and you receive recognition for your efforts.

Robert says that there is no doubt that starting your own business is a huge challenge, but with the right research and planning, the right people around you and a good set of values that you apply to the vision of the company, you have a very good chance of making it all succeed.

Robert says he is lucky. He has a strong supportive Wife, Mandy, who is also part of the business, along with efficient and hard working staff such as Julia McLauchlan and Aidan Harmer who are building up their own skills in a learning environment. 

However, the most important and most supportive people for CPR Insurance Services are our clients who have stuck by us and supported us over the past seven years. Our focus remains on providing the best possible service we can and always acting in their best interests. To all our clients, we say thank you!

read more

CPR Insurance wins Brokerage of the year

CPR Insurance Services picked up the award for the Best Brokerage (1-5 staff) in Australia, last Friday Night (4th May 2018) at the Insurance Business Magazine Awards held at the Westin in Sydney.

Judging came from various parts of the industry. It is a great honour to be recognised for our hard work and particular Business values we follow. A full list of winners is listed here.

Success comes from having great staff, and we thank Aidan Harmer and Julia McLauchlan as important support staff for helping us win such an award.

CPR Insurance has been in operation for more than 7 years now and is only successful because of the wonderful support from our staff, insurers and most importantly, our fantastic clients who put their faith and trust into our company to be their Risk Advisers and Brokers. 

Thank you to all.

read more