News

Making Experts more Accountable for their advice?

News >>

New York didn’t expect a severe storm like Sandy. We can’t rule out the possibility of these catastrophic events happening to our major cities.

Very limited research and development funding is available to come up with innovative methods to prevent loss of life. The extent of damage and how they spread and propagate is difficult to estimate accurately. However if properly supported and funded engineers and scientists, can come up with better predictions of these events.
Despite this, we did hear of the news of six Italian scientists charged for manslaughter and gaoled for six years each for failing to predict the intensity of a 2009 earthquake that killed over 300 people. Allegations were made against the Engineers of Wivenhoe Dam in Queensland. They were forced to defend themselves, although they had mentioned the difficulty of predicting these extreme events. We also do not want our scientists to no longer provide advice to us in the future. We have already seen how many Scientists have been heavily criticised for daring to relate Climate Change to these severe weather events.
Well the global insurance industry does believe it and are concerned that there will be much more frequent and more severe weather related events in the future costing billions. Better to reduce these potential costs with pre-event planning. However, we need all the help we can get and making experts afraid to provide advice is not the way.

But this is why we have Professional Indemnity Insurance, but it does not stop you from being gaoled. Also scientists cannot afford the sums insured they are likely to need if they get their advice wrong.

There needs to be a balance between accountability and needing the help of experts, but gaoling those that make a mistake is plain wrong with such un-predictable natural catastrophes. Otherwise no one will want to advise on such things making the risk even worse.

Last changed: Nov 06 2012 at 9:43 AM

Comments

  1. None Found

Add Comment

Latest News

D&O premium pool ‘must treble’ to return to profitability

A new report – called "Show Me The Money!" by insurer XL Catlin and law firm Wotton + Kearney – is the second in a series of three white papers on securities class actions and their impact on the Directors & Officers Liability (D&O) market. The main conclusion is that Directors’ and officers’ (D&O) insurance premiums are under-priced significantly and need to rise strongly to restore profitability. The main risk areas are those exposed to securities class actions, 

It says Directors & Officer's Side A, Side B and Side C cover has been chronically underpriced since at least 2011, while the frequency of class actions is increasing as more plaintiff lawyers and litigation funders enter the space.

The analysis suggests last year’s overall premium pool of about $210 million would need to increase by at least three times to establish a profitable market, if it is assumed all other factors stay unchanged.

“Recent market developments would indicate most D&O insurers are now endeavouring to restore some semblance of profitability to their portfolios after years of market losses,” the report says.

read more

75% of Cyclone Debbie claims settled

In the 6 months since Cyclone Debbie devastated Queensland and parts of northern New South Wales:

• more than 31,000 homes and business have been repaired or received settlements from their insurance company

• more than 20,000 families have had possessions replaced

• more than 4,500 motor vehicles have been repaired or new vehicles provided

• hundreds of local builders and trades have been working on properties to repair the damage and destruction caused by the cyclone

• over $5 million has been paid EACH DAY to assist local communities, residents and businesses.

read more