Association Liability Claims Scenarios

One of the most famous cases that did not have Directors & Officers Liability cover but led to the development of Association Liability as we know it today.

It is the National Safety Council case and involved a man called Max Eise who volunteered his time to be Chairman of a Not for Profit Organisation back in the early ’90’s. He trusted those Officers reporting to him. However Max breached his duty of Care because Max was accountable along with his fellow Directors for one of the biggest frauds in Australian History to a Not For Profit Organisation (NFPO). Max was Chairman of the National Safety Council (Victoria Division)

When the Victorian division of the National Safety Council collapsed in 1990 with debts of $255 million, each of its directors, who were acting in a voluntary capacity, was sued by the Commonwealth Bank.

The collapse was largely attributable to the fraud of managing director John Friedrich and it was arguable the directors were not really to blame.  All board members settled with CBA out of court except for one the Chairman of the Board, Max Eise.

Protesting his innocence to the end, Max opted to defend the action, lost and had a $97 million judgement made against him. NCS did not have an Association Liability policy in place and Eise, whose primary asset was his home, lost everything.

The following information is offered to illustrate possible allegations which could be made against a non-profit sports club. In order to fully understand the Association Liability Policy, the policy should be read and reviewed in detail. The precise coverage afforded is subject to the terms, conditions and policy as issued.

Employment Claims

Hypothetical: Employee/volunteer is terminated and files suit alleging wrongful discharge or discrimination based upon the sex, race or age of the employee/volunteer.

 Hypothetical: Allegations are made that the club's Board refuses to appoint a minority as a director thereby causing damage to the person.

 Hypothetical: Volunteer coach files suit alleging the directors and officers wrongfully denied his request to volunteer based on rumours that he had previously been convicted of child molestation charges, which were false.

Third Party Discrimination Claims

Hypothetical: Member (player) files suit alleging discrimination after being suspended from a game shortly after the directors learn of his involvement in an armed robbery.

 Hypothetical:Member (player) files suit alleging age discrimination alleging a volunteer/employee wrongfully denied a younger members' request to participate in an older member age group.

 Hypothetical: Former Member threatens legal action after he was suspended from the club after threatening other members with violence alleging discrimination and complaints fabricated

Sexual harassment Claims

Hypothetical: Member (player), employee, or volunteer files suit alleging the coach sexually imposed upon her and that the board members were negligent in the selection of the coach and in failing to supervise his activities.

 Hypothetical: Employee alleged that General Manager used sexually suggestive language implying possible job loss if she did not submit which caused her to resign

Defamation

Hypothetical: A competing club files suit alleging the Board allowed materials to be distributed that libeled or slandered the club as a result of the communications by the organisation and its directors and officers.

 Hypothetical: Chairman of an organisation defamed a similar organisation for not spending donations appropriately with high administration costs. It was alleged it caused a large reduction in sponsors

Breach of Duty of Loyalty Claims

Hypothetical: Director, officer, employee or volunteer is sued for allegedly using the organisation as a business conduit to benefit himself.

Breach of Duty of Care Claims

Hypothetical: Directors are sued for furnishing goods, services and facilities to a person disqualified under applicable law or bylaws from receiving those goods, services and facilities.

 Hypothetical: Directors are sued for approving a plan involving large borrowings to expand services to the community that ultimately caused the Association’s demise. It was alleged they failed to ensure appropriate due diligence and to research its viability for success

Failure to Supervise

Hypothetical: Directors are sued for failing to conduct routine audits and failing to supervise the Treasurer once it discovers a dramatic shortfall in its bank account.

Hypothetical: Volunteer lost sight of patient being taken out for the day from a mental institution. Patient confronted a child and assault was attempted.

Other examples of claims can be found at these links

The Catholic Church could be held liable for Priest's actions

Make sure you are registered as a Charity or risk large fines

Latest News

CPR joins Ausure

We would like to announce to all our Clients, Prospective Clients, Suppliers and Insurers, that Cooper Professional Risks Pty Ltd trading as CPR Insurance Services, will be leaving National Adviser Services Pty Ltd (NAS) and joining Ausure Pty Ltd as a Corporate Authorised Representative from 5 March 2018.

Fundamentally, there is no difference to you, except our Invoices will look a little different, and the Banking details will be in a different name and account number. Everything else at CPR stays the same.

There are a number of reasons we have made this decision, but the primary reason is for what we believe is best for our clients.

read more

Special offer to CPR Insurance clients

Employsure are providing a FREE Business Health Check to all our clients and gives you the opportunity to receive an analysis of the health and safety requirements in your workplace. Also. Employsure  will review your employment agreements as well as your wage rates helping you to avoid workplace claims.

Ordinarily this would cost you at least $1,250 but because you are a CPR Insurance client, it is free!

It involves the following review for you.

SAFECHECK

A specialist Work Health and Safety Consultant will visit your workplace and carry out:

A review of your business’ current work health and safety policies, procedures and systems to identify areas of concern or non-compliance

Following the review, you will receive a report summarising the findings and the health and safety

Status of your workplace

WAGE CHECK

A Wages Adviser will review your rates of pay and produce a Wage Check report.

The review will be conducted against the industrial instrument applicable

A report will be supplied advising if the wages are compliant and what steps to take to achieve compliance

CONTRACT REVIEW

A Document Consultant will review an employment agreement and provide recommendations.

The review will highlight compliance issues with the Fair Work Act 2009 as well as best practice

The report will make recommendations to achieve compliance and provide protection to your business.

This will remove any areas of potential dispute and risk

So what do you have to lose? Contact us on 07 3123 1137 and arrange 

read more